It was the fall (or was it spring) semester of my junior year of college. I was in the empty computer lab and addled from not sleeping for 3 days. I had Microsoft Windows open. Blank. White. A one-dimensional white room that I”ve been occupying in for the whole day as it transitioned into evening and then slowly creeping into the dead ambience of night. For the past week, I couldn’t write anything, let alone force myself to read the material for class. I remembered the topic of the essay clearly: analyze the difference and similarities between Leibnizian and Spinozan monism. It was about female sexual predators and the intersection between the legal system and gender norms. Everything was born out of the orphic egg as the cosmos formed from the primordial yolk.

I could no longer tolerate this way of life: endless days of attending a dull lecture (if I even managed to attend class), going to work, and retreating into domestic isolation to sulk and fester in my own depression. That moment in front of the computer of me struggling to write a single word on that document had me pondering: what the fuck am I doing with my life? What vague future am I working towards? Is this all worth it in the end? What do I truly want in life? I truly hated my life during that time – I had nothing to show for it, I had nothing worth living for, and nothing to look forward to. The plan was that I finish university and start establishing a respectable career, maybe as a lecturer, therapist, social worker, or whatever, yet no path seemed satisfactory to me. I was never attracted to conventional modes of living, not because I’m a rebellious free-spirit, but because of something else….Something more deeply rooted in my being and outlook.

Throughout my life, even before the onset of mental illness, I’ve always had nihilistic tendencies. I was never one to think my life had meaning or that I was destined for a higher purpose or greatness, however that didn’t mean I did not have my own ambitions. I merely had the biological imperative to live and to explore and that was enough justification for living, at least initially, yet apparently not enough to sustain the will to live. Nothing satisfied me or made me happy in the long run, except for one thing: violence.

I’ve never been a particularly physically violent person, but the language of violence seems to speak to me the most keenly – killing, maiming, violating, brutality, oppression, and domination and their presence within the human condition didn’t require further explanation for me. I knew. I understood. I understood violence born out of rage. Violence as an exercise of power. Or as an extension and manifestation of lust. And as another tool of rationality and progress in the name of secular, humanistic values that actually in the end propagate a system built on oppression and exploitation. To live is to bleed, and you (or I) can’t fully experience the full extent of life without the force immanent within it. I remember as a young girl studying taekwondo and loving the physical and mental discipline required to master it and the pain that came with it. There was an artistry to it all by way of learning to reign in the violence and force until when it was necessary to utilize them. Mind ruled over matter in that one must not give into their violent impulses but rather channel them in a controlled and rational manner, and sparring was the activity where I could exercise these principles. In a match, if you use too much force you either lost or you were disqualified. Brute force was frowned upon, instead technique, reading your opponent, and tactical intelligence were favored, which are much more effective and impactful means of channeling violence. I was at my happiest when I sparred and won. Or even if I lost, I was still given the opportunity to fight and to learn from my mistakes. I know someone would suggest that I should get into MMA or boxing, but I wouldn’t want that. I don’t want to operate in the daylight and express my violence through societal sanctioned entertainment. It’s not about expressing violence for the sake of violence but it’s something more corrosive and at the core.

During that 3 day insomnia stretch, I was binging execution videos and snuff films (or what was available without going into the deep web). I was watching pseudo-snuff porn as that was the only way I could get off. This brings back memories of the time in high school where I read a book about sex trafficking in Eastern Europe. One story that stood out to me was a young girl being sodomized by a group of men in order to break her in. About a decade later, I listened to a podcast about domestic violence and in one account a woman was imprisoned in her house by her husband. He would beat and rape her daily, and forced her to eat from a dog bowl. Whenever they would go out, he had her duck her head under the glove compartment so she wouldn’t see the street signs and he threatened to kill her if she attempted to prop her head up. She didn’t even know her home address. In all of these moments, I was overtaken with sadness for these people as well as with a sadistic and morbid arousal. I felt empathy for the victims but at the same time I would be lying if I said I didn’t want to do those things to other people.

When I was a middle schooler, I was obsessed with serial killers which wasn’t too unusual for people that age. I’ve heard true crime and serial killers are popular with women because the fear and danger they experience in life are realized and taken seriously in those stories. They serve as guides to avert danger (via morbid fascination). I never related to that, at least not consciously. I always related to the predatory serial killer, and maybe this was my own form of internalized misogyny seeping through since I saw the often female victims as nothing but pieces for the male serial killers to project their violence onto; this was a more virulent manifestation of the male gaze that I’ve internalized. Anyone can become a victim and I didn’t care about them; they were faceless and nameless nobodies in comparison to the sensationalized serial killers. I hated femininity and femaleness and witnessing serial killers was a way to kill and make obsolete my own femininity. My violent and antisocial (and quite phallic) predilections are not in line with society’s view and expectation of women. We’re socialized to be nurturing, self-erasing, peaceful, compliant, and deferring and my instincts go against those things. Of course make no mistake, I’m not making a feminist argument for who I am since this entry has nothing to do with the betterment of women, obviously.

My violence is like a black hole, devouring everything in its vicinity and corroding everything it touches. Except when it’s not. If I lacked the compassion that I have and possessed more drive, I wouldn’t hesitate to be a more destructive force, whether I be a criminal or a politician. Even now, in my more stable state of mind, I still find myself unsatisfied with the peace. I want intensity. I want to live on the fringes. I need to bleed and cut. In order for my life to mean something, for it to be worth living, I need to walk hand-in-hand with death whether that be physically or psychologically.

Returning to this: https://the-black-book-gallery.com/2021/06/11/post-apocalyptic-ukiyo-e/


The demolished cityscape represents the self/ego and the different blocks and aspects of the city represent the different aspects of the self. Initially I thought the crumbling landscape symbolized a fractured ego. But I’m coming to the conclusion that the dreams mean something else.


From the destruction and decay of the cityscape, life reasserts itself. The modern city represents alienation and compartmentalization, and the whole edifice of it all is destroyed, while oddly enough maintaining the bustling nature of it, arguably the main feature of a city.


Vegetation overtakes the sprawl. Whorehouses and crackhouses are situated alongside decrepit, concrete playgrounds and businesses.


Innocence and the darker aspects of the self commune with each other, coming into contact and communicating with each other.


The whole psycho-geography of the landscape is fascinating – the simultaneous urbanity and the primitiveness of the landscape seamlessly coexist, bringing forth new ways of living, communing, relating, communicating with others and viewing and inhabiting oneself. And the reason I compared the dreams to ukiyo-e is that these elements – the urbanity, primitiveness, seediness, playfulness- seem to mesh harmoniously, literally a world floating above the real world.


Heaven, hell, and purgatory all coalesce in this one spot. This one location. In this liminal space.


So I’m seeing this dream as the process of holistically integrating the ego.


As someone who’s mental health goes in and out of stability and who not infrequently went into psychotic states, this bodes well especially since I’m waaayy more stable these days.


Hopefully, long gone are the days of the schizophony of the fractured self, whose various aspects were in irreconcilable tension with each other. Though it might be premature to hope for that.

The actual experience of the dream is accentuated by the alternating feeling of being disembodied from reality and the lush sensuality/viscerality of the intense and raw atmosphere.

It was simultaneously dream-like and fleshy. It was pulsating, as if one entered into the beating heart of the center of a city and feeling the electricity run through the air and coursing through one’s veins.

The famous Japanese woodblock prints known as ukiyo-e, or “pictures of the floating world”, had their origins in these districts, and often depicted scenes of the floating world itself such as geisha, kabuki actors, sumo wrestlers, samurai, merchants, and prostitutes.

The term “ukiyo”, when written as meaning “the floating world”, is also an ironic, homophonous allusion to the earlier Buddhist term ukiyo (憂き世, “sorrowful world”), referring to the earthly plane of death and rebirth from which Buddhists sought release.[2]

In its modern usage, the term ukiyo is used to refer to a state of mind emphasising living in the moment, detached from the difficulties of life. – Wikipedia

I’ve been getting these semi-reoccurring dreams of a dreamscape. Imagine the entirety NYC that’s semi-demolished and bombed out but it’s still bustling. It’s nowhere near as populated as it originally was but there’s still people there doing commerce.

It felt like an almost idealized mixing of different aspects of NYC from different eras.

From the gritty atmosphere of the 1970s before Giuliani cleaned up the city.

To the modern hipster gentrification of the city.

The funny thing about it all is that I’ve never been to NYC.

Each block was interlaced with wrecked abandoned builds and semi-demolished businesses and buildings used as playgrounds by kids.

I remembered seeing a chic and busy 3 story coffee house (semi-demolished of course).

The city was simultaneously stylish and decayed. Wrecked yet bustling with life. Dangerous while also something that could only exist in dreams, “a floating world.”

Underlying it all was a joie de vivre.

Brothels and crackhouses situated alongside cement playgrounds and an apothecary.

As is the logic of the floating world.

There was the rawness of living in an gritty environment populated by criminals and prostitutes. Or at the very least, their presence was more front and center and seemingly tolerated as if they were a natural part of the landscape.

But it never reached the level of being confronted by brute reality.

Some women are untamable. Some are out of reach. And there are others who are unavailable. I consider myself to be under the realm of the unconsumable.

I don’t care to be relatable. Nor does being digestible to most people interest me. The person I am and the person who I want to be is one entirely swallowed by my own gaze.

To be understood is a beautiful thing, but even after I’m decoded, the gulf between you and I reveals itself. No amount of closeness will tear myself away from my own clutches.

A lot of people pay lip service to admiring independent women but when you actually encounter one who lives entirely by her own decrees and doesn’t pay much mind to your mode of being aside from passive acknowledgement? This goes beyond independence and empowerment and leans toward a schizoid detachment from conventional human mores.

I acknowledge our interdependence as a species, one where I’m not exempt from, and like everyone else, I have needs and I want to be loved and to love. But there’s always going to be an unremitting sense of alienation from others and I’m fine with that. Because you know what? At this point in my life, I don’t put much stock into what other people value and admire since a lot of them value and admire stupid and reprehensible things.

The purpose of this piece is not to brag or to bring to light how special I am. Ironically, there are more people like me out there, just as unconsumable if not more so in some regards. There are some people out there who refused to be subsumed under the wellspring of humanity. They deny its fruits and nourishment in order to venture into the inhuman and alien. Some are even labeled as monsters but I’d argue that the root of monstrosity stems from a deep humanity – it originates from people’s deep attachments, their traumas, their loyalties, their undying love, their desire to fit in and survive. Their monstrousness is so deeply human that it’s banal.

Echoes from the invocation reverberate
As the cacophony of voices fill the space
With songs that venerate
The journey to the edge

When I speak of evil, I’m not speaking of moral degeneracy but an excess – an excess in energy, in passion, in curiosity, in desire, in ambition….

The type of excess that never reaches its catharsis and finitude, and in some cases, spirals down into the bowels of existence.

As the traveler descends down
The choir of echoes begin to wane
No longer comforted by the communal rites
The traveler begins to truly journey alone

It is the evil that harkens back to childhood, to an innocence that gave way to this excess. Unencumbered by societal constraints, the child freely lets his imagination run free and stretches it beyond its limits.

Rimbaud once stated that genius is a return to childhood. The genius is said to be possessed by a daimon or has an attending spirit that accounts for his uncanny perception.

As echoes cease their litanies
The traveler feels naked
And opened to be consumed by whatever awaits him
But there’s no destination…

The path of evil has no justification for its existence. It just is and it’s compelled to fulfill its will and expend its energy, as it has no other mode.

It seems to be in contention with death but instead it runs hand-in-hand with it as evil courts and flirts with destruction and disaster, tempting death to quell its expenditure.

In realizing that there’s no destination
The traveler realizes the freedom he possess
He’s a true sovereign
With that, he can go anywhere he desires

I don’t want to produce literature. I want to write litanies of evil with words that don’t signify but rather embody meaning. Words that evoke imagery and feelings from the foreign place that happens to reside from within.

I was at a crowded bar/restaurant one night. All I could recall from it were the thick blacks and the deep reds. If I could describe it more accurately, it was like a small little corner of hell where its residents momentarily took refuge from their eternal suffering. Even Satan understood that weekends were necessary for keeping up morale for both his minions who administered the torture and the agonized denizens who needed a respite from their torment. Hell’s powers, principalities, thrones and dominions had no hierarchical significance here. From Paimon, to Lilith, to your common demon, all mingled and fraternized with each other. Maybe it was Hell, or maybe it was your common earthly night hub, who knows. Who cares.

I was in a secluded corner of the bar, just drinking and retreating into my own mind as I usually do when I go to bars. I rarely go to them to meet other people but instead to more readily access my subconscious through intoxication, and the ambiance and white noise of a bar are a pleasant change of scenery from the domestic isolation of home at midnight. The music, the people, and the chattering were just a blur, just background noise and faceless figures. But through the corner of my eye, I saw someone approach me. I didn’t acknowledge their presence by not looking their way, and I just kept looking straight ahead, staring at nothing.

The figure sat by my side, and he introduced himself as an ex-Catholic priest. He looked fairly young to be an ex-priest, I thought. He was young, with thick curly brown hair, and he had a kind, but cute face. As for what happened next, it was all a blur. As far as I can remember, we talked about God, debated the cosmological arguments about his existence, and contemplated our place in the universe, all of which I wouldn’t be able to recount right now. But what I can remember was the increasing tension between us. It was so thickly palpable that even the embers of Hell couldn’t suffocate me with their fumes. He suddenly but gently laid his hand on my cheek and guided my face into a kiss which turned into a passionate embrace. Even in that dank place, with that kiss, all I could experience was the universe and “God.” God became personalized, visceral, and in the flesh. What occurred was boundlessness between God and us. No. It was a consuming of God and his universe, and in committing this act, we became the hypostasis of that reality thereby becoming gods ourselves. It was the creation of a reality that should have been, At least for that moment. Maybe we were in Hell, and we were playing out our delusions of grandeur and power through our lust just to be punished for it once the delusion was over.

Kindernaut: A portmanteau of kindergarten and psychonaut that I made up.

Another oldish post of mine, written a year ago:

When I was a kid (like 5 and 6), I would frequently experience astral projections which I could induce intentionally and accidentally. I would be sitting on the couch, watching TV, and then all of a sudden I would experience myself looking at myself that’s sitting on the couch from the corner of the ceiling. I would see both selves, the one on the couch and the one in the ceiling corner. I could also experience myself as different people; I could be a Native-American man in his 50s, a Hispanic woman in her 20s, etc. I was floating through different minds. These experiences made me question the fabric of reality. If I myself am real? If I’m actually situated in the house I’m living in? What if I’m actually inhabiting someone else’s body? Or what if I’m dialing in from another dimension? I haven’t astral projected in forever and I don’t know if at this moment and time, my mind is pliable to do that.

These weren’t the only instances of mind-altering experiences. While I had a lot of friends as a child, deep down I desired to leave my body and traverse multiple universes. Similar to the astral projections, I would “zone out” and go into these semi-deep trances, and this especially happened when I was swinging on the swings while listening to my Walkman. The swinging motion and being high off the ground enhanced the ‘high’ feeling of the experience. I gained a lot of inspiration from the books I’ve read and the tv shows and films I watched, and what I often did was recombine characters and storylines in my head from various mediums and create my own universe(s). Or I would just zone out and be deeply rooted in the moment. I wouldn’t think, I would just be, and that’s when the greatest insights and inspirations would emerge. I unwittingly was in a deep meditation during those times, so deep that these must’ve been proto-psychedelic experiences.

In middle school, these experiences started to wane considerably but I still had meditative states, though most of my states were tinged with religious symbolism. And these were especially potent when I was in mass. I would often meditate on the crucifixion of Christ, and how this was the greatest expression of love and surrender to ever occur. My religious meditations were also very sexually oriented, of a sadomasochistic nature actually (which led me to discover Marquis de Sade and Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, whose names inspired the terms sadism and masochism respectively). Even then, as a virgin and not having a boyfriend yet, I knew that sexual surrender and religious surrender were of a similar nature – both involved the dissolution of ego boundaries and an ecstatic union. But the ultimate nature of these religious sadomasochistic fantasies wasn’t of morbid violence but a desire to reach a mystical boundlessness. I was attracted to extremes – extremes of excess and asceticism, of purity and debauchery, of piety and heresy, etc. We often modulate our lives towards the middle of these extremes, but I was a creature greedy for fringe experiences. And this led me to another insight: Christianity and the concept of goodness cannot exist without evil. Without evil, the moral high ground of the Church would lose its power and potency. Judas who betrayed Jesus, Jesus’s executioners, the torturers who executed the martyrs were all necessary in the propagation of goodness. And this lead me to another insight: without the concept of evil, God isn’t particularly necessary. God damned humanity from the start, it wasn’t Adam and Eve. God knew what would occur and yet still “let” it happened. If all was perfect in the world, we wouldn’t pay much mind to God aside from passive recognition of his goodness and providence. But if sin and evil were introduced into the world, there’s more of a explicit need for God’s providence and salvation through his grace. It’s no wonder that the Gnostics considered the God of the Bible to be an evil demiurge. It’s only through our intent and dependency that God has power. It was this revelation that led me away from Catholicism.

This was from years ago that I wrote this:

The body is a space where various cultural, biological, aesthetic codes and signifiers interface and combine. In some cultures, the body gets scared, mutilated, tattooed to indicate a coming of age, status, and the passage of time. Aesthetic is narrative and appearances are important. While the outward presentation may not fully expose one’s inner workings, it does give a comprehensive summary of who you are and what you’re about in both subtle and not so subtle ways, but of course the message that’s intended and the message that’s received don’t always overlap. I first got a glimpse of this between the ages of 8-10 when I was going through puberty, and reached menarche at age 10. By age 11, I already had C cup breasts and looked mature for my age, cues for some older men to flirt with me, make advances towards me, and occasionally harass me. Of course my peers at the time wanted to join in on the spectacle at the oddity that I was. The idea that really took root in my mind was what it means to be female, and coming to understand what being female entailed. I hated my femaleness since it marked me. My body was a public spectacle for others to comment on, leer at, and grope, a thing that matured faster than my mind, not to mention having all the sexual desires of woman but not fully understanding what those desires are. I almost think these conflicting drives set up a precedent for the duration of my life in that there’s always the need for me to exert control. Control over my image, how I orient myself, how I seek to manifest my own values and vision, and a lot of that control was exercised through the many disciplinary, aesthetic, and punishing practices I inflicted on my body, learning and experimenting with different ways to tell stories with it.

In my preteens and early teens, I nearly developed an eating disorder in order to wash away my womanness, an identity at the time that I felt was thrusted upon me. But what also came from my strict exercise and diet regiment was a deification of self-discipline and control to extreme degrees. Through harsh and unforgiving discipline of the body and mind, I wanted to reach to some superhuman level of existence. I wanted to overcome all of my weaknesses, become this exceptional being that’s beyond reproach and human folly. I never become that being.

Since I was 8 to until about recently, I had severe acne and then the accompanying acne scars. All I saw was pus-filled, pulsating bumps and craters. Once again, I was marked. I felt like a leper, and I wanted to further embody that monstrosity. While making obsessive attempts to treat and hide my facial deformities, I would cut my body to ribbons and burn parts of my body (1st degree burns at most). Each new mark and blood trail was a new verse on this book of flesh. I wanted to be stigmataed with the inner workings of my psyche in all its accompanying rage-filled shame, bitterness, hate, hunger, and envy. I hated my body, the deformities on my face felt like a foreign force was occupying it, but at the same time there was a sacred reverence with each act of self-mutilation. I used to fantasize and dream about cutting off my own limbs and gouging out my own eyes as those acts represented the combination of my rage and a (twisted) control over my own body as well as the desire to be liberated from it. Nowadays I mostly stick to tattoos.

Sex is poetry made in flesh and blood. Past and present lovers leave little pieces of themselves on me with each individual fragment having a story to tell. A bite mark from a man who had a fetish for teeth marks on skin. A lipstick stain from the time when a woman was kissing me on the neck while I was feeling between her thighs. A razor blade cut from someone who thought my skin looked absolutely gorgeous all bloodied up. Here the need for control slowly wanes and at some point in time, all laid claim to my body and our stories collide. Over time the physical markings eventually fade, but the emotions, sensations, experiences are still coded within me.

The body is the main mode through which we navigate the world, and with that, I navigate the world by embodying all the narratives I weave.

When it comes to categorizing my sexual orientation, I can’t seem to neatly place it under a label, not because I’m particularly special or that it’s beyond labels, but because they don’t quite capture its fluidity and ambiguity. That’s not to say that other people don’t experience that same type of fluidity and ambiguity (they very much do), it’s just that I don’t see the point of labeling my sexuality nor do I find it entirely helpful. I find that asking the right questions is the key initial step to learning and growing since pointed questions indicate an understanding of a subject while also realizing where the gaps and ambiguities lie. To me, my sexuality is a question mark, a staring point that paves the way for more questions and exploration.

I’m primarily attracted to men (cisgendered, trans, and male-presenting people) than I am to women. Men drive me crazy, send me into a frenzy, and induce me into an obsessional madness. While I can be VERY sexually attracted to women, the attraction doesn’t extend beyond lust. I can love them as friends and sisters but they don’t induce the same erotic obsession that men do. I think part of it is that men also inspire a miasma of angst, frustration, and anger that I don’t experience with women. There’s enough distance, polarity, and conflict with men that they inspire a fascinated longing. With this description, it would be easy to say that I’m heteroflexible and leave it that. While that’s accurate, I feel like it serves as a period, rather than a question mark, at the end of the sentence thus possibly ceasing any further inquiry. The label confers certainty. It answers the question of whom I’m attracted to and could be possibly attracted to.

But sexual orientation is just one ingredient in the complex concoction that is sexuality. The label serves as a categorical vector but it doesn’t portray the vicissitudes that desire brings. Of course for many people, a label is a point of departure, a a framing device that helps one situates one’s desires and how those things operate. Last year I would’ve identified as asexual which is not my baseline but rather it was a thing that latched onto me for the time being, and there were a myriad of reasons for why I identified as such- hormonal changes, different priorities at the time, exploring different facets of myself, etc. At the time, the asexuality pointed towards something more than just mere sexual orientation and attraction, and what those other things are I can’t really say yet.

Keeping my sexuality outside the realm of categorization and leaving it in the realm of the semiotic a lá Julia Kristeva keeps it both familiar and strange. The undulating felt viscerality of it all is experienced in all its nuances and slippages. It’s one that warrants interpretation but also disinvests in the clinical detachment of analysis. It’s not initially linguistic, scientific, or sociological but phenomenological and embodied. It divests in form and hermeneutics while also being rife with meaning. In our culture, I think we have an uneasy relationship with ambiguity. Everything needs to be ordered, rationalized, analyzed, and codified, and while these things make life more efficient and livable they don’t leave much room for people and things who occupy the thresholds or the in-between spaces, or those who don’t occupy any spaces. Ambiguity leaves too much room for misinterpretation and misunderstanding but it’s in these follies that we learn and discover especially if let ourselves be humble enough to entertain the fact that we can be wrong. It also confronts us with the fact that we’re perpetually in media res. These ambiguities make it known that we’re in a constant Heraclitean process.

Underneath ineffability lies Truth

A Truth that we all perceive

That’s embodied within all of us

And it is through this universality

That mere words

Are not enough to express

Its meaning and necessity

In actuality, words are not necessary

Because ineffability is the universal language of embodied knowing

A knowing that goes beyond articulation

Beyond modal contexts

A knowing that’s individually felt and experienced

That reflects a perennial nature

This notion is probably considered old-fashioned and primitive in the post-modern age:

An enduring and eternal Truth that transcends culture and space and time itself

A Truth that’s not codified

But rather one that we know once we encounter it

Do I know the nature of this thing?

Hell if I know

Have I experienced it?

Maybe

Possibly

All I know is that is that I must leave space for ineffability in an age of constant discourse